LibGuides: Right to Repair: Home

Welcome

Welcome to the "Right to Repair" research guide! This guide will help you get started with finding resources on the topic. It includes links to key library subscription resources, including article databases, journals and books, as well as open web content.

Make sure to cycle through the tabs on the left to discover more about the topic.

Ask a Librarian - During Regular Library Hours

In-person at the Library Reference Desk Bldg. 9, 3rd Floor 
Via Text to (650) 535-8398
Via email: canlibrary@smccd.edu
Via Chat  on our website

What is Right to Repair?

What is “right to repair”?

The idea behind “right to repair” is in the name: If you own something, you should be able to repair it yourself or take it to a technician of your choice. People are pretty used to this concept when it comes to older cars and appliances, but right-to-repair advocates argue that modern tech, especially anything with a computer chip inside, is rarely repairable.

Legally, American shoppers are mostly already allowed to repair whatever they buy (those warranty-voiding stickers you’ve probably seen on gadgets are usually bogus under the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act), but practically speaking, people are often denied the information or the parts to do so. This is where the right-to-repair movement comes in. The Repair Association, a right-to-repair advocacy group, has several policy objectives, including some that can be corrected with laws and others that require a shift in buyer expectations.

Those objectives are:

Make information available: Everyone should have reasonable access to manuals, schematics, and software updates. Software licenses shouldn’t limit support options and should make clear what’s included in a sale.
Make parts and tools available: The parts and tools to service devices, including diagnostic tools, should be made available to third parties, including individuals.
Allow unlocking: The government should legalize unlocking, adapting, or modifying a device, so an owner can install custom software.
Accommodate repair in the design: Devices should be designed in a way as to make repair possible.

Quoted from:
Klosowski, T. (2021, July 15). What You Should Know About Right to Repair. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/what-is-right-to-repair/

Apple Yields to DIY Movement as 'Right to Repair' Bills Proliferate

Self-repair movement still has a long way to go, advocates say. They are pushing legislation in most states that would include not only phones but also farm equipment, medical devices and, in many cases, a broad range of tech devices.

Apple Inc. will offer some tools and parts so owners can repair their own phones, conceding to pressure from consumer groups, lawmakers who introduced bills in more than half the states and President Joe Biden.

The self-repair tools and parts will first be available for iPhone 12 and iPhone 13, the company announced, with availability for Mac computers to come early next year.

"The new program isn't as comprehensive as the Right to Repair reforms discussed in more than two dozen state legislatures this year would be, said Nathan Proctor, senior right to repair director for U.S. PIRG, a consumer group, in an emailed statement. "Given current public information, Apple still maintains a lot of proprietary control over repairs on its devices, although more details are emerging."

Quoted from:
Povich, E. S. (2021, November 19). Apple Yields to DIY Movement as “Right to Repair” Bills Proliferate. Stateline.Org (Washington, DC).

Videos

CQ Researcher

Monopoly Power - Are new antitrust measures needed to restore competitive balance?
A century after Congress passed a series of antitrust laws to rein in giant firms that dominated key industries, the same issues have re-emerged on the business landscape, from Silicon Valley to the industrial Midwest to Wall Street. Antitrust laws give government regulators legal tools to prevent companies from controlling a market in a way that harms the public by stifling competition or setting unfair prices. But how the government should enforce these laws has been hotly debated. Despite pockets of activity over the last 45 years, a laissez-fare philosophy has dominated antitrust policy among regulators and judges. Critics of this approach have gained the ear of President Biden, who wants to reinvigorate enforcement to curb activities he says limit wages and raise consumer costs. Two questions dominate the discussion: Can big companies amass too much power, exerting excessive control over markets and elections and, ultimately, undermining democracy? And has this contributed to a widening wealth and income gap?
Regulating Tech - Will new internet rules safeguard consumers?
As governments wrestle with the role of multinational technology corporations in everything from driving hate crimes to distributing news to augmenting — or replacing — humans with artificial intelligence, countries are adopting laws that seek to rein in negative effects of Big Tech. But such laws can create a confusing labyrinth of regulations for companies operating across national lines. While the most influential countries' laws have effects beyond their borders, others risk being left behind by platforms that disable the disputed functionality or even leave the country entirely rather than comply. These policies can also have unintended consequences, such as raising the cost for startups to enter the market, stifling their ability to innovate and to challenge established competitors. At the same time, regulators struggle to create rules that can keep up with the fast pace of new technological developments, such as artificial intelligence (AI). With more tech regulations coming from multiple countries or regions, complying with laws in some parts of the world can lead to backlash in others. As countries wrestle with how to regulate Big Tech, issues being debated include the role these companies play in the decline of newspapers and other news media, the balance between innovation and stagnation and how regulations may hinder freedom of speech.
Circular Economy - Can companies renounce a “take-make-waste” model?
A growing number of companies worldwide are attempting to reimagine their businesses to keep their products and components continuously in use. Prodded by shareholders, environmentalists and governments, they are signing on to the concept of a circular economy, in which goods are designed to be easily shared, reused, refurbished, harvested for parts and eventually recycled for their raw materials. The goal is to eliminate waste and reduce pollution and the greenhouse gases responsible for climate change. China and the European Union are leading the way, investing money and creating new laws and regulations to accelerate a transition to a circular economy. In the United States, individual states are passing laws that require producers to finance and manage take-back programs for their products. But progress has been slow. Analysts estimate that 8.6 percent of the world economy is circular, down from 9.1 percent two years ago. And some question whether the circular economy will yield the promised environmental benefits, while others say progress will rest on customers changing their behavior.